DeepSeek

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash

DeepSeekBalanced
ThinkingTool UseVisionStructured Output

About this model

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture. It activates 8B parameters on input and 16B on...

Performance Tier

Balanced

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash is a balanced model from DeepSeek : strong performance at a reasonable price.

Strong cost-performance ratio. Reliable for most professional use cases without premium pricing.

Pricing

This model is included in Elosia plans
Affordable

Low cost. Suitable for sustained use and high-volume interactions.

Typeper 1M tokens
Input (prompt)$0.030
Output (completion)$0.500
Cache read$0.010

Capabilities

Context Length1.0M
Max Output Tokens944K
TokenizerDeepSeek
Inputtext, image
Outputtext
Release DateSeptember 10, 2026

Benchmarks

General Intelligence
MMLU
Not reported
GPQA Diamond
90.9%
Mathematics
MATH-500
Not reported
Programming
HumanEval
Not reported
Reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam
39.2%
Multimodal
MMMU-Pro
77%
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.1
90.6%

Where does DeepSeek v4.1 Flash stand?

Compare its performance index against every other model.

View the performance leaderboard

Recommended Use Cases

CodingAnalysisResearchMathematicsData Extraction

Strengths

  • Causal encoder-decoder MoE design that activates only 8B parameters per token during prefill and 16B during decode, keeping input-heavy agentic workloads cheap to serve
  • Aggressive KV-cache compression (cross-layer reuse and FP4 caching) that keeps a 1M-token context lightweight in memory
  • Native image understanding, trained jointly with text from the start of pre-training
  • Continuously adjustable reasoning effort on a 1 to 100 scale to trade accuracy against inference cost
  • MIT open weights with a published technical report and a 1M-token context

Limitations

  • Weak factual recall: independent testing shows it almost always answers questions it does not know instead of abstaining
  • Agentic scores depend heavily on the harness: the vendor's own table shows Terminal-Bench 2.1 moving by several points across agent scaffolds
  • Verbose reasoning at maximum effort, which weighs on latency and token budget
  • The Humanity's Last Exam and MMMU-Pro scores shown come from third-party testing; the vendor publishes MMMU-Pro only for the base model

Frequently asked questions

Resources

This model may use your data for training

Similar Models